Simm-ply Simm
« VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010) »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 19, 2013, 1:30am




Simm-ply Simm :: John Simm :: John in Theatre :: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Page 3 of 4 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010) (Read 3,345 times)
edzel2
DI Sam Tyler
****
member is offline

[avatar]

John Simm fan since 2006


[homepage]

Joined: May 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,396
Location: United Kingdom
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #30 on Feb 23, 2011, 9:47am »

I think the way their polls are set up is all wrong, personally. Wouldn't it be much fairer if it were done this way:

London/West End:
Best Musical (Sub Categories of best actor, actress, set design, etc)
Best Drama (Sub Categories of best actor, actress, set design, etc)
etc

Touring Productions:
Best Musical (Sub Categories of best actor, actress, set design, etc)
Best Drama (Sub Categories of best actor, actress, set design, etc)
etc

Regional :
Best Musical (Sub Categories of best actor, actress, set design, etc)
Best Drama (Sub Categories of best actor, actress, set design, etc)
etc

and with a separate section for:

Best Shakespeare - Regional (best actor, actress etc)
Best Shakespeare - London/West End
Best Shakespeare - Touring

What do the more regular theatre-goers amongst us think? It seems to me to be very unfair that (for instance) John in a regional production should have to compete with another artist in a West End or even a Touring Show - to reflect true popularity you'd have to work out the market share of audiences based on length of production, venue size, etc etc. This way, each section is only competing against its own peer group. Much fairer I think! Of course, this award is based on people actually bothering to vote, not ticket sales. Is there any market research/award given for sales figures, does anyone know?

And also, all this doesn't alter the fact that to come second with a production which had such a short run is rather impressive - or so it seems to me. Because five weeks is short, isn't it? Is it unusually so?) and in a relatively small venue (can't remember the seating figure now but wasn't it somewhere around one thousand?) I think they should feel chuffed with that!





« Last Edit: Feb 23, 2011, 9:48am by edzel2 »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
smallhobbit
Moderator
*****
Head Media Mogul
member is offline

[avatar]

More thanks to UTD



Joined: Jul 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,213
Location: just east of Wales
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #31 on Feb 23, 2011, 10:43am »

It is basicly a West End with a nod to the rest of London poll. Unfortunately as we've noted before, critics don't move out of London unless they have to. There's a very narrow vision generally for theatre, which is a shame because for a start London theatre seats cost double what you can pay elsewhere.

With only one category for regional "Hamlet" did incredibly well. When you consider that the RSC in Stratford didn't even get a mention and they had some excellent performances last year (and it's not just me saying this - the critics agreed too).

I think five weeks for a regional production is fairly standard. Somewhere like the Crucible would expect to put on a variety of performances over the year, catering for all tastes and wouldn't therefore be able to justify a run of three months, which is more common in the West End.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
Wonderful banner made by the marvellous UTD
edzel2
DI Sam Tyler
****
member is offline

[avatar]

John Simm fan since 2006


[homepage]

Joined: May 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,396
Location: United Kingdom
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #32 on Feb 23, 2011, 1:05pm »

Thanks for the info SH - with that knowledge then yes, Hamlet did do very well, didn't it! *feels slightly mollified*

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
jinxed
Co-Administrator
*****
Steampunk Queen
member is offline

[avatar]

Thanks von gelmini



Joined: Jan 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,235
Location: Up North
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #33 on Feb 23, 2011, 3:00pm »

I read somewhere that Hamlet sold in excess of 30,000 tickets - some of them to very far flung places and lots of new customers. I'm sure they'd have John back there doing whatever he wanted in a heartbeat.
Fingers crossed ;D
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
Thanks UTD :)
edzel2
DI Sam Tyler
****
member is offline

[avatar]

John Simm fan since 2006


[homepage]

Joined: May 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,396
Location: United Kingdom
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #34 on Feb 23, 2011, 5:51pm »

;D Wow. And yes, toes crossed as well!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
angelica
Daniel Appleton
**
member is offline

[avatar]

I am not worthy



Joined: Mar 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 257
Location: Naismith manor
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #35 on Mar 3, 2011, 9:08pm »

Hell, I'd go back to Sheffield to watch John in panto LOL! OML what panto role can you see John in? Hmmm, Prince Charming? Or Widow Twanky perhaps? ;)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]

All I can say is guh...
bethylated
Elling
*
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Jan 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 159
Location: Weymouth, MA
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #36 on Mar 3, 2011, 11:21pm »


Mar 3, 2011, 9:08pm, angelica wrote:
Hell, I'd go back to Sheffield to watch John in panto LOL! OML what panto role can you see John in? Hmmm, Prince Charming? Or Widow Twanky perhaps? ;)


An extremely hawt Captain Hook!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
jinxed
Co-Administrator
*****
Steampunk Queen
member is offline

[avatar]

Thanks von gelmini



Joined: Jan 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,235
Location: Up North
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #37 on Mar 4, 2011, 12:14am »

He could be the genie in the lamp...just rub vigorously ;)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
Thanks UTD :)
angelica
Daniel Appleton
**
member is offline

[avatar]

I am not worthy



Joined: Mar 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 257
Location: Naismith manor
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #38 on Mar 4, 2011, 6:35pm »


Mar 4, 2011, 12:14am, jinxed wrote:
He could be the genie in the lamp...just rub vigorously ;)


PMSL!!!!!!!!!!! ;D

Oh WOW Captain Hook, yay, verryyyyyyy nice!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]

All I can say is guh...
unturndownable
Administrator
*****
Techy Media Boffin
member is offline

[avatar]

There is no such thing as 'The method'



Joined: Aug 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,075
Location: Just everywhere
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #39 on Mar 5, 2011, 1:13am »

What does PMSL mean?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
smallhobbit
Moderator
*****
Head Media Mogul
member is offline

[avatar]

More thanks to UTD



Joined: Jul 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,213
Location: just east of Wales
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #40 on Mar 5, 2011, 10:46am »

It's young people speech for "made me laugh a lot"
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
Wonderful banner made by the marvellous UTD
jinxed
Co-Administrator
*****
Steampunk Queen
member is offline

[avatar]

Thanks von gelmini



Joined: Jan 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,235
Location: Up North
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #41 on Mar 5, 2011, 10:53am »

UTD - this site is very useful - I have it in my favourites for when I want to get down with the kids ;)

http://www.urbandictionary.com/
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
Thanks UTD :)
unturndownable
Administrator
*****
Techy Media Boffin
member is offline

[avatar]

There is no such thing as 'The method'



Joined: Aug 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,075
Location: Just everywhere
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #42 on Mar 5, 2011, 5:02pm »

I guess part of my point was that it's more inclusive if we don't use too many abbreviations... Oh well. I do know about the urban dictionary, was just too lazy to use it this time. ;)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
edzel2
DI Sam Tyler
****
member is offline

[avatar]

John Simm fan since 2006


[homepage]

Joined: May 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,396
Location: United Kingdom
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #43 on Mar 5, 2011, 9:45pm »

I keep forgetting about it, TBH - but have now looked up 'PMSL' and... well, almost PMSL ;D
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
angelica
Daniel Appleton
**
member is offline

[avatar]

I am not worthy



Joined: Mar 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 257
Location: Naismith manor
 Re: VOTE FOR HAMLET!!!! (updated Dec. 3, 2010)
« Reply #44 on Mar 6, 2011, 9:06pm »

So sorry guys, I use that one a lot in my texts to a really good friend of mine and have started using it on forums, sorry wont do it again. On mums net there is A HUGE list of them which you are encouraged to use, it can get pretty annoying TBH.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]

All I can say is guh...
« Page 3 of 4 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread] [Share Topic] [Print]

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile